@article{article131, author = {Zhelezniak, Mykola and Ishchenko, Oleksandr}, title = {Some perspectives on the application of artificial intelligence in encyclopedias}, journal = {The Encyclopedia Herald of Ukraine}, volume = {16}, year = {2024}, pages = {1--14}, doi = {10.37068/evu.16.4}, issn = {2706-9990}, eissn = {2707-000X}, abstract = {The article explores potential directions for employing generative artificial intelligence to enhance encyclopedia articles. Specifically, it proposes the idea of building additional knowledge-based content on encyclopedia platforms designed to summarize the information contained within articles (e.g., generating highlights, annotations, summaries, etc., through AI tools). According to the authors, such supplementary text blocks would be both interesting and beneficial for readers, aiming to improve article comprehension and retention of information while enabling them to quickly grasp the essence of extensive articles. This case study using selected articles from the Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine demonstrates that virtual assistants like ChatGPT and Gemini exhibit a satisfactory level of proficiency in generating this type of supplementary content. However, the authors also emphasize the risks of editorial misuse of artificial intelligence, as it could be employed to generate primary content of articles replacing human authors. This raises concerns regarding the accuracy, reliability, and overall value of such content. Finally, the article underscores the need for scholarly discourse on ethical standards for the use of artificial intelligence by encyclopedia editorial officers.}, url = {https://evu.encyclopedia.kyiv.ua/article/131}, keywords = {encyclopedias, generative artificial intelligence in encyclopedias, ChatGPT, Gemini, encyclopedia publishing ethics, encyclopedic content}, addendum = {References:\\ 1) Andriievska, V. (2018). Key directions of development of education in information society. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni T. H. Shevchenka. Pedahohichni nauky, 153, 3–6.\\ 2) Bentzen, N. (2023). Knowledge supply chains in an age of truth decay: The role of encyclopedias. Studia Lexicographica, 17(32), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.33604/sl.17.32.5\\ 3) Blyznyuk, T. (2017). Prospects for the use of information and communication technologies in mountain schools of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Mountain School of Ukrainian Karpaty, 17, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.15330/msuc.2017.17.69-72\\ 4) De Schryver, G. (2003). Lexicographers’ dreams in the electronic‐dictionary age. International journal of lexicography, 16(2), 143–199.\\ 5) De Schryver, G. (2023). Generative AI and Lexicography: The Current State of the Art Using ChatGPT. International Journal of Lexicography, 36(4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecad021\\ 6) Gupta, P., Ding, B., Guan, C., & Ding, D. (2024). Generative AI: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques. Data and Information Management, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2024.100066\\ 7) Jovanovic, M., & Campbell, M. (2022). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Prospects. Computer, 55(10), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2022.3192720\\ 8) Jung, Y., Chen, C., Jang, E., & Shyam S. (2024). DoWe Trust ChatGPT as much as Google Search and Wikipedia? In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.365086\\ 9) Loveland, J. (2019). The European Encyclopedia: From 1650 to the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646390\\ 10) McKean, E., & Fitzgerald, W. (2024). The ROI of AI in lexicography. Lexicography. https://doi.org/10.1558/lexi.27569\\ 11) Peña-Fernández, S., Meso-Ayerdi, K., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Díaz-Noci, J. (2023). Without journalists, there is no journalism: the social dimension of generative artificial intelligence in the media. El Profesional De La Informacion. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.27\\ 12) Petroni, F., Broscheit, S., Piktus, A., Lewis, P., Izacard, G., Hosseini, L., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Lomeli, M., Schick, T., Bevilacqua, M., Mazaré, P., Joulin, A., Grave, E., & Riedel, S. (2023). Improving Wikipedia verifiability with AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(10), 1142–1148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00726-1\\ 13) Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v5i1.1052\\ 14) Rees, G. P., & Lew, R. (2023). The Effectiveness of OpenAI GPT-Generated Definitions Versus Definitions from an English Learners’ Dictionary in a Lexically Orientated Reading Task. International Journal of Lexicography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecad030\\ 15) Rossner, A., Cassel, M., & Huschens, M. (2024). Do users really care? Evaluating the user perception of disclosing AI-Generated content on credibility in (Sports) journalism. In MuC ’24: Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2024, 35, 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3677490\\ 16) Serbin, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a tool for creating dynamic product descriptions in e-commerce. Marketing and Digital Technologies, 7(4), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.7.4.2023.5\\ 17) Shi, Y., & Sun, L. (2024). How generative AI is transforming journalism: Development, application and ethics. Journalism and Media, 5(2), 582–594. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5020039\\ 18) Zhelezniak, M., & Ishchenko, O. (2021). Online encyclopedias of the USA as actual education resources. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 84(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v84i4.4410\\ }, }